Designing a global crisis response platform that reached 85M+ people
The site wasn’t meant to be beautiful. It was meant to be understood by someone running on no sleep who had just fled their home.
- Company
- International Rescue Committee · 2022
- Role
- UX Fellowship, Google.org
- Team
- Only designer on a fellowship of about twenty
- Read
- 7 min



85M+
people reached across every crisis site
<1 week
to launch a new crisis site, down from months
20+
countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria
UN
"Connect" award at the 2023 SDG Action Awards, won by the IRC’s Signpost program
The short version
- Context
When Russia invaded Ukraine, Google.org sent a $1.5M grant and a fellowship team to the International Rescue Committee (IRC), which runs information services for people displaced by crises.
- Problem
Every IRC crisis site took months to build. Its users couldn’t wait: they had just fled their homes, and were exhausted, on old phones and slow connections, often reading in a second or third language.
- What I did
As the only designer, I built the site around one principle: design for the exhausted mind. Then I turned it into a template so every future IRC crisis site inherits that principle without a designer.
- Impact
The Ukraine site reached 5.5 million people in its first six months. New crisis sites now launch in under a week, are live in more than 20 countries, and have reached more than 85 million people.
Business problem
A new crisis, and a new website every time
When people think of humanitarian aid, they think of food, water and medicine. For someone who just fled, information matters as much: where to sleep tonight, which border is open, what papers to carry.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 set off Europe’s largest displacement crisis since World War II. The information refugees needed was scattered across Telegram channels, Facebook groups and one-off websites, with no way to tell what was true. And it changed constantly: borders closed, free housing ended, legal volunteers came and went. A wrong answer could mean a night outside, or a ride with the wrong person.

Google.org committed a $1.5 million grant and a team of fellows to the IRC, with a brief to build a site for Ukrainians with a local partner, United for Ukraine, in six months.

What it cost
The IRC runs information services like this in dozens of crises at once, but each new site took months to launch. For someone who left home last week, that’s too late.
The users
We were designing for exhausted users
Our users had just lost their homes. We needed to match their reality, not build a beautiful website.
- 01
Old phones, slow connections
Many were on older devices and 2G or 3G connections, rationing data. Every image cost them time and money.
- 02
Three languages, uneven fluency
People moved between Ukrainian, Russian and English. Many refused to use Russian, even when it was their first language.
- 03
No attention to spare
They were making life-changing decisions while exhausted and on the move. Anything that made them think twice cost them.
Solution
The only designer in the room
A series of decisions in the order I made them
I volunteered to lead UX and found out that meant being the UX team: the only designer on a fellowship of about twenty. After my manager needed me back, I did this alongside my day job for six months.

Decision 01 of 07
Designed for the exhausted mind
A stark direction over a warm one.
Photography is warm and human, but on a slow connection, every image cost our users. So I set one principle for every decision: design for the exhausted mind.
A photo-rich site.
It’s what humanitarian sites look like.
Cut non-essential imagery.
Keep pages light enough to load on a bad connection.
Passed over: Higher data usage design
- Homecoming support request
- Psychological support
- Education services
- Employment services
- Community
- Crossing the border
- Housing
- Getting Financial Help
- Social Support
- Healthcare
- Useful contacts
- Employment
- Education & Childcare
- Non-Ukrainian Refugees
- Housing
- Financial Help
- Before returning
- Legal information and rights protection
- Housing in Ukraine
- Financial support in Ukraine
- Humanitarian assistance in Ukraine
- Employment opportunities in Ukraine
- Educational opportunities and professional development
- Psychological support
Chosen: Extremely performant design
- Homecoming support request
- Psychological support
- Education services
- Employment services
- Community
- Crossing the border
- Housing
- Getting Financial Help
- Social Support
- Healthcare
- Useful contacts
- Employment
- Education & Childcare
- Non-Ukrainian Refugees
- Housing
- Financial Help
- Before returning
- Legal information and rights protection
- Housing in Ukraine
- Financial support in Ukraine
- Humanitarian assistance in Ukraine
- Employment opportunities in Ukraine
- Educational opportunities and professional development
- Psychological support
Decision 02 of 07
Designed a language that didn’t depend on words
An icon that could be understood before the label was read.
Language was the hardest constraint, so every core service, from housing to legal aid to financial support, got a simple icon. I built on familiar conventions rather than a custom set, and in testing, refugees said the icons looked like the ones already on their phones.
Type got the same treatment. I chose Noto Sans, an open-source typeface that rendered Ukrainian, Russian and English cleanly in one family.
No single language worked for everyone.
Translation alone couldn’t carry the site.
Icons as the primary way of communicating.
- Temporary housing
- Psychological support
- Legal support
- Education
- Childcare
- Healthcare
- Immigration documents
- Temporary housing (alt)
- Financial support
- Jobs
- Social support
- Pets
- Volunteer
- Donate
- Non-Ukrainian refugee info
- Other information
Noto Sans
Glyph
Characters
Latin, Cyrillic, Greek and Devanagari letters, all in Noto SansDecision 03 of 07
Took the rest of the foundations off the shelf
Familiar patterns meant less for exhausted users to learn.
Fewer custom pieces meant faster pages and a faster engineering team.
Two weeks after I joined, we launched the first version. It was rough and thin on content, but people could use it, and it improved every day.
There was no time to build a design system.
Ant, a large open-source system.
Customized only where the experience needed it.

Decision 04 of 07
Created a daily feedback loop with real users
It looked clunkier, and it worked.
Our researcher was in Warsaw, close to the people we were designing for. I’d send her designs at the end of my day, she’d put them in front of refugees, and I’d wake up to findings. The time difference made it a daily loop.
The details it caught were small and decisive.
People didn’t recognize the hamburger icon.
When I added the word "Menu," they still didn’t tap it.
Draw a button around it.
On a normal product, that’s a polish ticket. For someone looking for a place to sleep tonight, it’s the difference between finding the housing page and giving up.
- Menu
- Menu
Refugees called the site simple and fast; some said it reminded them of Facebook. Where nobody knew what to trust, familiar read as trustworthy.

Decision 05 of 07
Spent the second half on the IRC’s problem
Each built by hand over months.
Our IRC partners kept comparing the Ukraine site to their older sites for Syria and Afghanistan, each built by hand over months for users just as exhausted and short on data. That was the bigger problem.
A week-long design sprint in New York with Google.org and the IRC produced a crisis starter kit: a brand, a social media presence and a website, deployable in under a week. I owned the website.
A site for Ukrainians, in six months.
Two months in, it was 80 to 90 percent done.
Spend the remaining four months on the IRC’s bigger problem.

Decision 07 of 07
Made the principle the default
Nobody has to argue for the principle again.
The Ukraine decisions made this possible. The icons and type carried the most meaning and never needed translating, so they went into the core as-is. Noto Sans, chosen for Cyrillic, also covered Arabic and Farsi.
Every new crisis site took months to launch.
A new site doesn’t need a designer.
The IRC pulls colors from the local partner’s logo, loads content into the CMS, and the site comes out light, plain and legible, built for people with nothing to spare.
Results
Impact of the work
Ukraine
The site reached 5.5 million people in its first six months, handled hundreds of thousands of information requests, and helped tens of thousands of people find temporary housing.


Every crisis after it
The template cut launch time for a new crisis site from months to under a week. It has since been deployed in more than 20 countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, and has reached more than 85 million people. The IRC’s Signpost program, which these sites belong to, won the "Connect" award at the 2023 UN SDG Action Awards.
Ben has a rare ability to see beyond the immediate problem and design for lasting, scalable impact. Working with Ben on the Signpost platform was nothing short of a masterclass in thoughtful, user-centered design. Ben went far beyond supporting our collaboration with our Ukrainian partners, he architected a global system that continues to make a real difference in people’s lives, and that truly speaks for itself.
What survives me
The template. Every site deployed since the end of my fellowship has inherited the same core: the icons, the type, and the light pages. None of that needed me to stay.
What I’d do again
Pick one principle and hold every decision to it. "Design for the exhausted mind" settled the arguments about photography, icons, and page weight before they started, and it’s what made the work portable to other crises.
What I wouldn’t
Wait two months to look past Ukraine. The IRC’s older sites were there from the start. Comparing them sooner would have left more of the fellowship for the template.





